In our latest webinar, Executing and delivering value through Investment and Development Management, the team were asked “Why [we] maintain this attitude of always selling off surplus sites.”
This is a question I hear often, and it’s an important one. The decision to sell surplus NHS sites is never taken lightly. Here’s why this approach is not just a policy, but a practical necessity for the NHS and the communities we serve.
Reasons why we sell surplus sites
Alternatives to selling surplus sites
While selling is often the chosen route, it’s not the only option considered. Here are some alternatives:
Addressing the need for flexibility and prevention
We understand the importance of flexibility in planning, especially for step-down and out-of-hospital services. International examples show the value of larger, more adaptable sites. In the UK, we recognise that some larger NHS sites are under pressure due to limited space. Our approach aims to balance the need to unlock value from genuinely surplus land with the need to retain flexibility for future service models.
We work closely with local systems to ensure that disposals do not compromise future service delivery. Where there is a case for retaining land for future expansion or new models of care, we can and do hold sites or use phased or adapted disposals to retain flexibility – indeed we have facilitated a number of Community Diagnostic Centres recently on our sites.
In summary
Selling surplus NHS sites is not about reducing flexibility or ignoring prevention. It’s about making the best use of public assets to support patient care today, while planning for the needs of tomorrow. Alternatives are always considered, and we are open to learning from best practice and ongoing dialogue about how we can improve our approach. We explain our approach in more detail in our Guide to Acquisitions and Disposals.
If you have further questions or would like more expert advice, please get in touch, we’re always happy to help.